killory.blogg.se

Violet uml editor composed of vs aggregate of
Violet uml editor composed of vs aggregate of






violet uml editor composed of vs aggregate of

This paper discusses the extent to which economic growth and the availability of natural resources can be re-coupled through a more sustainable use of debt, for instance by shifting mainstream banking forces to partially support environmental conservation as well as economic growth. This context creates temporal mismatches between natural resource growth and firms’ resource extraction rates, as well as between economic growth and the capacity of the government to effectively implement natural resource conservation policies. Firms inappropriately use bank credits for speculative goals–rather than production-oriented ones–and for exponentially increasing rates of technological development. the ‘ what’), but rather, these are due to the inappropriate use of debt by private actors (i.e. Interestingly, environmental and economic collapse in our model are not caused by debt growth, or the debt-based nature of the economic system itself (i.e.

violet uml editor composed of vs aggregate of

Our model explores the extent to which debt-driven processes, within debt-based economies, enhance the decoupling between economic growth and the availability of natural resources. What is really the relationship between debt and natural resource sustainability, and what is the role of debt in decoupling economic growth from natural resource availability? Here we present a conceptual Agent-Based Model (ABM) that integrates an environmental system into an ABM representation of Steve Keen’s debt-based economic models. This policy dilemma is aggravated by the lack of analyses factoring the impact of debt-growth cycles on the environment. However, if private debt consistently grows faster than GDP, the consequences are financial crises and the current unprecedented level of global debt. A debt-based economy cannot survive without economic growth.








Violet uml editor composed of vs aggregate of